OpenAI

GPT Image 2

8.7/10
Maker
OpenAI
Origin
United States
Released
Apr 21, 2026
Category
Image Generation

Strengths & weaknesses

  • Strong prompt-following for complex, multi-element compositions
  • Handles both generation and precise editing through one API
  • Small text, logos, and fine counts still need manual review
  • Less distinctive a look than Midjourney for pure aesthetic exploration

Evaluation

100% of weight measured

Scored on GPT Image 2 (medium) · sources as of Nov 4, 2026

Confidence band 8.7–8.9 · a model inside this range isn’t meaningfully apart from this one

w = weight, each criterion’s share of the overall score. Missing marks don’t count for or against. How scoring works

More in Image Generation

View all →
Midjourney

Midjourney V8.1

Under evaluation
  • Unmatched aesthetic taste and texture for concept art and exploration
  • Excellent for open-ended creative direction-finding
  • Weak at exact, repeatable text and structured brand templates
  • Discord/web-first workflow adds overhead versus API-first tools
Google

Gemini 3 Pro Image

6.4/10
  • High-fidelity output up to 4K with strong reference-image handling
  • Good starting point for complex, detail-heavy briefs
  • Higher latency than Google's own Flash image tier
  • Text accuracy and identity preservation still need spot-checking
Black Forest Labs

FLUX.2

5.1/10
  • Flexible family of variants trading off quality, speed, and cost
  • Open-weight options available for self-hosted production pipelines
  • Confusing lineup; easy to pick the wrong variant for the job
  • Needs its own hosting and infra work to unlock full control
Ideogram

Ideogram 4

5.9/10
  • Best-in-class for posters, logos-as-concepts, and text-heavy graphics
  • Open weights give deployment flexibility others don't
  • Still requires review of every rendered character for accuracy
  • Licensing and infra cost need evaluation before production use